Why do "journalists" do not stop at our politics and football and bring in any experts? Some have the false impression that they are "cunosctatori" of beer and publish articles that present one of the National: The most expensive? beer in the world - 775 euro bottle ? Why shit article is left to stink and is taken on (by Newz.ro )?
I claim to know about beer more than that: pour the neck and grind the fence, but if you happen to like the photo opposite. Even before filling the page with something inform yourself.
The article is presented to us the most expensive beer in the world. It costs 775 euro bottle , containing 12 liters of beer . In a simple calculation we encounter a bottle of 0.5 liters would reach about 32.30 euros, nearly 139 lei.
Well how is this the most expensive beer in the world when glass of pint of Samuel Adams Utopias sells at least $ 250, which is 720 lei bottle of 0.5 liters. I gave a counterexample of the most popular beers in the world in terms of its strength. It is a rare beer nor the most expensive, and if you find you have money to spend on ebay (and not just a bottle)
Concluzia1: there seems to be at least a beer more expensive than the most expensive beer from you.
Concluzia2: you repeat in journalism (I did not claim to know the culture of beer, but at least check the news)
Concluzia3: you repeat and general culture. When you translate it using google translator? Otherwise I do not explain why talk of Belgian region Wallonia Walloon and not (it's like I wrote an article in Romanian that mentions Switzerland and not Switzerland) and now teach Romanian and atia not come into lessons with world countries?










[...] This post WAS mentioned on Twitter by Cristealizari, Romeo Semeniuc. Semeniuc Romeo said: Ziaristu 'beer from the National http://twurl.nl/hegjpx [...]